Are You Really Connected?

It is hard to say, at least for North Americans, that social media has not taken over our lives. A trend that began early this decade has undergone explosive growth and now has a place in the history books. If Facebook were a country, it would be the 7th largest in the world. Think of how much power Mark Zuckerberg has. If he posted his political views on the homepage, more than 400 million people would be forced to see it.

I think a lot of us can readily admit that we've developed a dependency on such conveniences. What is so compelling about YouTube, Facebook, Twitter? Is it the constant interaction? The desire to read into someone's life? Think about how much media is geared towards giving you a second life...any game with an avatar, say, Second Life; or any movie where you inhabit a host body through the power of mind, like Surrogates. This genres is built to give you another shot at life, this time around, having more control over what happens. Of course, people find this really compelling. So compelling, in fact, that a Chinese couple let their newborn baby starve at home as they played Second Life at two separate internet cafes. The ironic thing is, they were working over the internet to raise a virtual daughter.

It amazes me how lost we are without a stimulus. If you just imagine yourself taking a seat in the chair next to you and not doing A THING, can you do it? I can hardly imagine it; I would probably pull out my iPod or check my cellphone. It is disgusting. We are putting all our energy into being more places than once. You want to be in the homes of your readers via Twitter, or in the ears of your friends via cellphones. Stand in front of a public entrance; eg. a school or hotel. Notice the second people get out of the building they put their hand to their ears and begin chatting. Do they really have something meaningful to say??! How did we say these things before cellphones?

Our generation may possibly be remembered for our multi-tasking. We can do ten things where our parents could only do two. How many (browser) tabs do you have going right now? How many different conversations are you carrying on via text? Doing homework with the music on? And when we are not multi-tasking, we feel lost and bored. At work, do you check your Facebook? Play Brickbreaker? It seems as if everyone is connected to somewhere else; a virtual realm. However, Facebook usage will eventually decline, but then a new and improved, shiner form of social media will take its place. Currently, software developers are creating an application that allows you to access all you information from any social media site you may have membership. This means, instead of logging in and updating every status, you just input it in the application and it applies it to all of your sites.

Where will this all lead us? Is it a bad thing? I cant say for sure, the only thing I know, is that our kids are about to step into a world we never thought possible.

Nature vs Nurture

Ah, the age-old debate. Obviously, we are who we are because of the two working in tandem. It is not one or the other. However, I would like to expose which parts of a person are developed more by one or the other.

So, physically, you are based of the genes of your parents...your environment doesn't affect your looks. But wait! What about goths or muscular people? What do they have in common? Well they have both modified their original appearance into something more suitable for them. Is this a result of genetics? As in, did their biological make up have fate set out for them to wear make-up or be at the gym five times a week? Maybe that trait was passed down by their parents, but more likely, I think it is a result of their environment. Through socially accepted practices and pressures, they made those choices. Did heredity influence Pam An to get a boob job? Doubt it...who can resist the temptation of a handful of greenbacks in our wallet?

What about sports? Are pro athletes born into the Hall of Fame? Hmm...alternately, were musicians born to sell 50 million platinum records? This may take some investigation. Now may be a good time to mention the book The Outliers, by Malcolm Gladwell (Blink, Tipping Point). He conducted a study of success. How did the pros get to be the way they are? How did Bill Gates earn the wealth of a small country? Gladwell claims that luck plays a huge part. These successful people share something in common; opportunity. I wont reveal anymore, but I urge you to read the book. So, whats the conclusion? Well, ask yourself, was Gretzky born to be great or was it the fact that his parents had him skating before he could walk? Gladwell expounds a theory called the 10,000-hour Rule. It makes sense. Imagine you put down the controller and gave up MW2. All the hours spent playing video games could have been put toward painting or something. Even if you didn't have a natural talent for art, you must admit, you'd be pretty damn good with 10,000 hours of hard work.

Now again, is it possible to have a natural talent for art? I don't think so. BUT! People are born with varying degrees of creativity, so some may be predisposed to create art in many forms.

What have we decided? We can now postulate that we are born with certain traits and we will be attracted to the things that we are good at, thereby getting better. If we were born athletic then we will likely be raised in an active lifestyle because we enjoy that environment due to our proficiency in it. Our parents provided the foundation, and our environment dictated what activities we pursue.

For all we know, Chris Rock or Dane Cook's parents are not humorous at all, but I think they are guaranteed to have passed on the foundation for humor; an open and inquisitive mind.